I'm wondering why some authors advocate labelling their testimony as fiction when people like Yarborough can testify without the need for a fringe theory genre cover story?
The reality of children used in MK Ultra mind control dark labs funded as “research’ or the oft used red herring of “National Intelligence” when that sector is really a bunch of psycho occultists, is finally emerging into the body politic outside of the lunatic fringe game theory.
https://www.einpresswire.com/article/819064056/memories-of-mk-ultra-a-riveting-and-disturbing-tale-of-trauma-mind-control-and-survival
Looking forward to this read. Welcome to the club.
I don’t recommend the path of recovering repressed memories via hypnosis and reiki as Bill has done. There are too many avenues for serious grand canyon size pitfalls before, after and during that process. For one thing, hypnotically recovered memories can’t be used in court and I am all about the real.
I am all about doing the real work of leaders rather than presenting a fragmented fiction that may or may not be true. I am not interested in supporting someone’s fake real, fake healed identity.
However, I do welcome the read and the puzzle pieces he may offer. I put those together with all the victim memories and my own. That is an ongoing process. I have been read in to the deepest MK intel that you won’t get but fragments of on the internet.
I am not interested anymore in “revealing the truth” because mainly, pearls at swine, but also that the important parts of all this is one’s own RETURNING to the original blueprint. Also known as REPENTING. Once you start that you don’t remember, you know. Because it was all always there. That’s just me.
That’s just it. I am interested in the real you, not the blah you that found a piece of yourself to present in a thought bubble. This link better describes the nature of his testimony which pretty much follows the pitfall path of many other presenters. I will still read it when I get a chance.
Strength in numbers for sure.